The Assessment of Environmental and Socio Economic Benefits of River Siti Hydropower Scheme in Mount Elgon Biosphere Reserve, Uganda
Asian Journal of Environment & Ecology,
Page 28-41
DOI:
10.9734/ajee/2022/v18i430328
Abstract
The study was carried out to assess the perceptions and responses of targeted beneficiaries of Siti Hydropower on the impact and benefits of the renewable energy scheme. Households in proximity to the power supply line were purposefully selected as a sample population. A semi-structured questionnaire was administered to 38 randomly selected household heads living on both sides of the power supply line. Face to face interviews with staff working with hydropower project and Mt. Elgon National Park (Biosphere Reserve) as well as the District Natural Resource Managers were conducted. In addition, nine focused group discussions involving 72 people, (eighteen of whom were women) were held. The results show that 78.9% of the respondents were of the view that the hydropower project had caused significant environmental problems and 21.1 % of the respondents did not think that the project had any significant negative impact on the environment. About 47.4% of the respondents associated the project with soil erosion along the water channel as the most negative environmental impact of the project, while 21.4% of the respondents highlighted the disruption of the water flow of R. Siti and R. Nyalit and 13.2% of the respondents identified deforestation especially inside Mt. Elgon National Park where the weir (intake) of the power station was located. However, 18.4% of the respondents did not believe that the project caused any negative environmental problem. Regarding the anticipated benefits, 42.1% of the respondents associated the project with social economic improvement of residents, 36.8% reduction on the reliance on fuel wood energy and 21.1% protection of R. Siti and R. Nyalit banks.
Keywords:
- Assessment
- biosphere reserve
- benefits
- hydropower
- renewable energy
- scheme
How to Cite
References
UNESCO. Good Practices: success stories on sustainable and renewable energies inUNESCO Sites. Place de Fontenoy: UNESCO. Paris Franceenergies; 2013.
Adebayo F, Akiyode MM, Lookman OA, Dahiru S, Ounyesiga L. Drivers and barriers of renewable energy applications and development in Uganda. Clean Technol. 2018;1:9-39.
Meng Y, Liu J, Leduc S, Mesfun S, Kraxner F, Mao G et al.. 2019. Hydropower development benefits more from 1.5oC than 2oC. Climate senario advancing earth and space science.
Chen Y, Gonul G, Ziereth G. Fiji renewable energy readiness assessment. Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates: International Renewable Energy Agency; 2015.
Akashie EU. Advantages and disadvantages of hydroelectric energy. Polytechnic University of Bucharest; 2022..
MEMD. Uganda’s sustainable energy for all initiatives action agenda. Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development; 2015.
Mayor B, Rodríguez-Muñoz I, Villarroya F, Montero E, López-Gunn E. The role of large and small scale hydropower for energy and water security in the Spanish Duero Basin. Sustainability. 2017;9(10):1807.
United States of America Department of Energy. An assessment of Energy Technologyand Research opportunities; 2015.
Kees M, Von Fije S. Final energy report of Uganda. Netherlands Enterprise Agency; 2018.
Nafuna MS. Uganda’s policy on energy and power. JICA Training on Energy policy, Tokyo Japan; 2013
UNIDO. World small hydropower development report. Vienna: United Nations Industrial Development Organization; 2016.
WWF. The energy Report for Uganda: A 100% Renewable Energy Future by 2050.The World Wide Fund for Nature- Uganda Country; 2015.
Omona. Jackson College (2010). Sustainable hydropower as a feasible solution to Africa’s generation needs: Small hydropower in Uganda- current and future projects. South Africa: Emperors Palace Johannesburg; 2015.
Katutsi V, Kaddu M, Migisha AG, Rubanda ME, Adaramola MS. Overview of hydropower resources and development in Uganda. AIMS Energy. 2021;9(6):1299-320.
Twebaze TR, P, Makuregye N, Muyambi E. Key issues in Uganda’s energy sector. Pro-Biodiversity Conservationists in Uganda. London: International Institute of Environment and Development; 2011.
Ferreira JHI, Camacho JR, Malagoli JA, Júnior SCG. Assessment of the potential of small hydropower development in Brazil. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2016;56:380-7
MEMD. Kampala, Uganda: Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development Renewable Energy Policy for Uganda; 2007.
Shikuku R, Makenzi P, Muruthi P. Poaching in the Mt. Elgon transboundary ecosystem. Int J Unesco Biosph Reserves. 2018;2(1):7-16.
Musau J, Sang J, Gathenya J, Luedeling E. Hydrological responses to climate change in Mt. Elgon Watersheds. J Hydrol Reg Stud. 2015;3:233-46.
Bamwesigye D, Kupec P, Chekuimo G, Pavlis J, Asamoah O, Darkwah SA et al. Charcoal and wood biomass utilisation in Uganda: the social economic and environmental dynamics and implementation. Sustainability. 2020;12(20):18337.
DOI. 10.3390/su12208337.
Egeru AS. Rural households’ fuel wood demand determinants in dry land areas of Eastern Uganda. Energy Sources B. 2014;9(1):39-45.
Egeru AS. Rural households’ fuel wood demand determinants in dry land areas of Eastern Uganda. Energy Sources B. 2014;9(1):39-45.
DOI: 10.3389/fenvs-2021.579878.
UBOS. National population and housing census. Uganda Bureau of Statistics, Kampla, Uganda; 2014.
Stenfors T, Kajamaa A, Bennett D. How to assess the qualitative research. Clin Teach. 2020;17(6):596-9.
Karytsas S, Mendrinos D, Karytsas C. Measurement methods of socioeconomic impact of renewable energy projects. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2020;410(1):1-13.
Muhwezi L, Basoona NK, Acai J. Assessment of rural road network management in Uganda as a driver of economic developmentL A case study of kabarole District. Int J Constr Eng Manag. 2021;10(1):8-16.
GON. Hydropower environmental impact assessment manual. Ministry of Forests and Environment, Government of Nepal; 2018.
Cernea MM. Social impact and social risks in hydropower programs: Pre-emptive planning and counter risk measures. Key note address: session on social aspect of hydropower development. UN Symposium on Hydropower and Sustainable Development, Beijing, China; 2004.
Hakizimana E, Wali UG, Sandoval D, Kayibanda V. Environmental Impact Assessment of Hydropower Plants in Rwanda: Nyabarongo1 hydropower Plant. Energy Environ Eng. 2020;7(2):27-37.
DOI:10.13189eee.2020.070202
Mahmud MAP, Huda N, Farjana SH, Lang C. Environmental sustainability assessment of hydropower in Europe using life cycle assessment. 2nd International Conference on Reliability Engineering, Material Science and Engineering; 2017.
DOI: 10.1088/175-899X/351/1/012006.
Demissie ITA, Samano GZ. Socio-economic and environmental impacts of micro-hydropower plants: case study on Jimma Zone Shebe Sonbo Leku Woreda, Ethiopia. Int J Eng Res Technol. 2016;5(7):607-12.
Smiet F. Business opportunities for renewable energy in Ghana- Embassy if the Kingdom of the northlands, Accra; 2016.
Tullos DD, Moore EF, Magee D, Tilt B, Wolf AT, Schmitt E et al. Biophysical, socio-economic and Geopolitical vulnerability to hydropower development on the Nu River, China. Ecol Soc. 2013;18(3):16-34.
Hughes R. Environmental impact Assessment and stakeholders involvement. International Institute of environment and development- Environmental Planning. 1998;11:1- 11.
Kabir SMZ, Momtaz S. The strength and weakness of legal provision and effective environmental impact assessment practices in Bangladesh. Int J Environ. 2011;7(2):149-65.
Esteves AM, Franks D, Vanclay F. Social Impact Assessment: the state of the art. Impact Assess Proj Appraisal. 2012;30(1):34-42.
Taako EG, Karatu K, Andama E. An Evaluation of environmental impact assessment practice in Uganda: challenges and opportunities for achieving sustainable development. Hellyon. 2020;6:1-11.
Gurung A, Ian B, Eun OS. Micro-hydropower: promising decentralised renewable technology and its impact on rural livelihoods. Sci Res Essays. 2011;616:1240-1248.
DOI: 10.5897/SRE 10.717
REA. Rural electrification strategy and plan 2013-2022. Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development, Kampal- Uganda; 2013.
Mohammed M, Teka H, Ayicha H. Environmental Impactof hydropower and alternative mitigation measures. Curr Investig Agric Curr Res. 2018;2(2):184-6.
Perse JM. Participation in environmental impact assessment of hydropower plants in Nepal: A context specific approach. Colombia: International Water Management Institute; 2017.
DOI: 105337/2017.215.
-
Abstract View: 48 times
PDF Download: 24 times
