Main Article Content
This review paper aims to address the topic of the living, prospects as well as jeopardies of the invasive Zebra Mussel. Broad literature reviews have been taken place to gather as many facts on this species as possible to summon all the most significant information up in one paper to be available for everyone. To get a better understanding of freshwater mussels in general, a short review of freshwater mussel diversity in America has been written also. The review paper focuses especially on living, prospects, and jeopardies in North America. The review revealed, freshwater mussels to be of practical importance and of great primeness for scientific research due to their unique life cycle. Especially the freshwater mollusk Dreissena polymorpha (Dreissenidae), colloquial known as the zebra mussel draws interest due to the mollusks’ invasive character and their tremendous filtering capacity. Once originated from the Ponto-Caspian region and currently present in 33 European Countries and 33 states of North America the freshwater bivalve draws interest all over the world. Their larval stage allows broad invasions of aquatic systems. Even though they can both harm their habitat as well as other organisms living in it, Dreissena polymorpha enormous filtering capacity can be utilized effectively if managed right. However, a lack of natural enemies and environmentally friendly pesticides makes control of Dreissena polymorpha in open water impossible.
2. Starobogatov Y, Fauna Mollyuskov i Zoogeograficheskoe Raionirovanie Kontinental’nykh Vodoemov Zemnogo Shara. Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Leningrad; 1994.
3. Graf DL, Cummings KS. Review of the systematics and global diversity of freshwater mussel species (Bivalvia: Unionoida). Journal of Molluscan Studies. 2007;73:291–314.
4. Lee DJ, Adams DC, Rossi FJ. The Economic Impact of Zebra Mussels in Florida, University of Florida; 2007.
5. Minchin D, Frances L, Sullivan M. Zebra mussels: impacts and spread. In: E. Leppäkoski S. Gollasch S, Olenin S. (eds). Invasive Aquatic Species of Europe: Distribution, Impacts and Management. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Dordreicht. The Netherlands. 2002;135-146.
6. Firth DC, Salie K, O'Neill B, Hoffman LC. Monitoring of trace metal accumulation in two South African farmed mussel species, Mytilus galloprovincialis and Choromytilus meridionalis. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 2019;141:529-534.
7. Pathy DA. The life history and demography of zebra mussel, Dreissena polymorpha, Populations in Lake St. Clair, Lake Erie, and Lake Ontario. University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, M. Sc. Thesis; 1994.
8. Magni S, Parolini M, Soave C, Marazzi F, Mezzanotte V, Binelli A. Removal of metallic elements from real wastewater using zebra mussel bio-filtration process. Journal of Environmental Engineering. 2015;3(2):915-921.
9. Binelli A, Magni S, Soave C, Marazzi F, Zuccato E, Castiglioni S, Parolini M, Mezzanotte V. The bioﬁltration process by the bivalve D. Polymorpha for the removal of some pharmaceuticals and drugs of abuse from civil wastewaters. Ecological Engineering. 2014;71:710–721.
10. Elliott P, Aldridge DC, Moggridge GD. Zebra mussel filtration and its potential uses in industrial water treatment. Water Resource. 2008;42:6-7.
11. Vanderstukken M, Declerck SAJ, Pals A, Meester LDe, Muylaert K. The influence of plant-associated filter feeders on phytoplankton biomass: A mesocosm study. Hydrobiologia. 2010;646:199–208.
12. Whitten AL, Marin JJR, McNaught AS, A mesocosm investigation of the effects of quagga mussels (Dreissena rostriformis bugensis) on Lake Michigan zooplankton assemblages. Journal of Great Lakes Research. 2018;44(1):105-113.
13. Ricciardi A, Neves RJ, Rasmussen JB. Impending extinctions of North American freshwater mussels (Unionoida) following the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) invasion. Journal of Animal Ecology. 1998;67:613-619.
14. Zieritz A, Bogan AE, Rahim KAA, Sousa R, Jainih L, Harun S, Abd Razak NF, Gallardo B, McGowan S, Hassan R, Lopes-Lima M. Changes and drivers of freshwater mussel diversity and distribution in northern Borneo. Biological Conservation. 2018; 219:126-137.
15. Molloy DP. Biological control of zebra mussels. Proceedings of the Third California Conference on Biological Control. University of California, Davis. 2002;86-94.
16. Wächtler K, Mansur MCD, Richter T. Larval types and early postlarval biology in Naiads (Unionoida). In: Bauer G, Wächtler K (Eds.), Ecology and Evolution of the Freshwater Mussels Unionoida. Springer–Verlag, Berlin. 2001;93–125.
17. Bogan AE. Global diversity of freshwater mussels (Mollusca, Bivalvia) in freshwater. Hydrobiologia. 2008;595:139–147.
18. Haag WR. A hierarchical classification of freshwater mussel diversity in North America. Journal of Biogeography. 2010; 37:12–26.
19. Nedeau EJ, Smith AK, Stone J, Jespen S. Freshwater mussels of the pacific Northwest, The Xerces Society in Portland, Oregone; 2009.
20. Elliott P, Aldridge DC, Moggridge GD, Chipps M. The increasing effects of zebra mussels on water installations in England. Water and Environmental Journal. 2007;19(4):367-375.
21. Karatayev AY, Burlakova K, Padilla DK. Growth Rate and longevity of Dreissena polymorpha (Pallas): A review and recommendations for further study. Journal of Shellfish Research. 2006;25(1):23-32.
22. Dölle K. Image: Zebra Mussels (Dreissena.Polymorpha). pdf-file
23. Benson AJ, Raikow D, Larson J, Fusaro A, Bogdanoff AK, Elgin A. Dreissena polymorpha (Pallas, 1771): U.S. Geological Survey, Nonindigenous Aquatic Species Database, Gainesville, FL.
Accessed: May 26, 2020
24. Beggel S, Cerwenka AF, Brandner J, Geist J. Shell morphological versus genetic identification of quagga mussel (Dreissena bugensis) and zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha). Aquatic Invasions. 2015;10: 93–99.
25. Kerambrun E, Delahaut L, Geffard A, David E. Differentiation of sympatric zebra and quagga mussels in ecotoxicological studies: A comparison of morphometric data, gene expression, and body metal concentrations. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 2018;154:321-328.
26. Scheffer M, Hosper SH, Meijer ML, Moss B, Jeppesen E. Alternative equilibria in shallow lakes. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 1993;8:275–279.
27. Jeppesen E, Søndergaard M, Christoffersen K, (Eds). The structuring role of submerged macrophytes in lakes. Springer-Verlag, New York; 1997.
28. Van Donk E, van de Bund WJ. Impact of submerged macrophytes including charophytes on phyto- and zooplankton communities: Allelopathy versus other mechanisms. Aquatic Botany. 2002;72:261–274.
29. McMahon RF. The physiological ecology of the zebra mussel, Dreissena polymorpha, in North America and Europe. American Zoologist. 1996;36:339-363.
30. Stanczykowska A, Zyska P, Dombrowska A, Kot H, Zyska E. The distribution of waterfowl in relation to mollusc populations in the man-made lake Zegrzynskie. Hydrobiologia. 1990;191:233-240.
31. Lewandowski K. Unionidae as a substratum for Dreissena polymorpha Pall. Pol. Arch. Hydrobiologii. 1976;233:409-420.
32. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Zebra Mussel Resource Document. Trinity river Basin, Texas.
Accessed: May 15. 2020
33. Olenin S, Orlova M, Minchin D. Dreissena polymorpha (Pallas, 1771). In: Gollasch S, Minchin D, RosenthalH, Voigt M (Eds.). Case Histories on Introduced Species: Their General Biology, Distribution, Range Expansion and Impact, Logos-Verlag, Berlin, Germany; 1999.
34. Hebert PDN, Muncaster BW, Mackie GL. Ecological and genetic studies on Dreissena polymorpha Pallas a new mollusk in the Great Lakes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 1989;46:1587–1591.
35. Johnson LE, Padilla DK. Geographic spread of exotic species: Ecological lessons and opportunities from the invasion of the zebra mussel Dreissena polymorpha. Biological Conservation. 1996;78:23-33.
36. United States Geological Survey (USGS). Non Indigenous Aquatic Species.
37. Lee DJ, Adams DC, Rossi FJ. The Economic Impact of Zebra Mussels. University of Florida. IFAS Extension; 2007;FE693.
38. Karatayev AY, Burlakova LE, Padilla DK. Physical factors that limit the distribution and abundance of Dreissena polymorpha (Pall.). Journal of Shellfish Research. 1998;17:1219-1235.
39. Karatayev AY, Burlakova, LE, Padilla DK. The effects of Dreissena polymorpha (Pallas) invasion on aquatic communities in Eastern Europe. 1. Shellfish Research. 1997;16,187-203.
40. Weinstein A, Cohen AN. The potential distribution and abundance of zebra mussels in California. Zebra Mussel Information Clearinghouse Newsletter, SUNY College at Brockport, New York. 1998;9:1-3.
41. Gatlin MR, Shoup DE, Long JM. 2013. Invasive zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) and Asian clams (Corbicula fluminea) survive gut passage of migratory fish species: Implications for dispersal. Biological Invasion. 2013;15: 1195-1200.
42. Rzepecki LM, Waite JH. The byssus of the zebra mussel, Dreissena polymorpha. I: Morphology and in situ protein processing during maturation. Mol. Mar. Biol. Biotechnology. 1993;2:255–266.
43. Clarke M. The effect of food availability on byssogenesis by the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha Pallas). J. Mollusc. Studies. 1999;65:327–333.
44. Ackerman JD, Sim B, Nichols SJ, Claudi R. A review of the early life history of zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) comparisons with marine bivalves. Canadian Journal of Zoology. 1994;72: 1169–1179.
45. Clarke M, McMahon RF. Effects of current velocity on byssal thread production in the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha). Proceedings of the Fifth International Zebra Mussel and Other Aquatic Nuisance Organisms Conference. Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 1995;39–45.
46. Clarke M, McMahon RF. Effects of temperature on byssal thread production by the freshwater mussel, Dreissena polymorpha (Pallas). American Malacological Bulletin. 1996;13:105–110.
47. Kobak J, Behavior of Juvenile and Adult Zebra Mussels (Dreissena polymorpha), Quagga and Zebra Mussels Biology, Impacts and Control, Chapter 21; 2013.
48. Lauer TE, Spacie A. Space as a limiting resource in freshwater systems: Competition between zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) and freshwater sponges (Porifera). Hydrobiologia. 2004; 517:137–145.
49. Burks RL, Tuchman NC, Call CA, Marsden JE. Colonial aggregates: Effects of spatial position on zebra mussel responses to vertical gradients in interstitial water quality. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 2002;21: 64–75.
50. Borcherding J. Ten years of practical experience with the Dreissena-Monitor, a biological early warning system for continuous water quality monitoring. Hydrobiologia. 2006;556:417–426.
51. Borcherding J, Jantz B. Valve movement response of the mussel Dreissena polymorpha—The infuence of pH and turbidity on the acute toxicity of pentachlorophenol under laboratory and field conditions. Ecotoxicology. 1997;6: 153–165.
52. Perry WL, Lodge DM, Lamberti GA. Crayfish (Orconectes rusticus) Impacts on zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) recruitment, other macroinvertebrates and algal biomass in a lake-outlet stream. American Midland Naturalist. 2000;144: 308–316.
53. French JRP, Bur MT. Predation of the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) by the freshwater drum in western Lake Erie. 1993;453–464. In: T. F.
54. Hamilton DJ, Akney CD, Bailey RC. Predators of Zebra Mussels by Diving Ducks: An Exclosure Study. Ecology. 1994;75(2):521-531.
55. Love J, Savino JF. Crayfish (Orconectes virilis) predation on zebra mussels (Dreissena polymolpha). Journal of Freshwater Ecology. 1993;8:253-259.
56. Serrouya R, Anthony R, Whoriskey FG. Predation on zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) by captive-reared map turtles (Graptemys geographica). Canadian Journal of Zoology. 1995;73(12):2238-2243.
57. Stanczykowska A, Lewandowski K. Thirty years of studies of Dreissena polymorpha in Mazurian Lakes of northeastern Poland, 1993:3-33. In Nalepa, TF, Schloesser DW (Eds.). Zebra mussels: biology impacts and control. CRC Press; 2014.
58. Laruelle F, Molloy DP, Roitman VA. Historical analyses of trematodes in Dreissena Polymorpha: Their location, pathogenicity, and distinguishing morphological chareacteristics. Journal of Parasitology. 2002;88(2):856-863.
59. Caraco NF, Cole JJ, Raymond PA, Strayer DL, Pace ML, Findlay SEG, Fischer DT. Zebra mussel invasion in a large, turbid river: Phytoplankton response to increased grazing. Ecology. 1997;78:588602.
60. Lopes-Lima M, Teixeira A, Froufe E, Lopes A, Varandas S, Sousa R. Biology and conservation of freshwater bivalves: past, present and future perspectives. Hydrobiologia. 2014;735:1–13.
61. IUCN. IUCN red list of threatened species; 2020.
Accessed June 2, 2020
62. Gills PL, Mackie, GL. Impact of the zebra mussel, Dreissena polymorpha, on populations of Unionidae (Bivalvia) in Lake St. Clair. Canadian Journal of Zoologie. 1994;72:1260-1271.
63. Hebert PDN, Wilson CC, Murdoch MM, Lazar R. Demography and ecological impacts of the invading mollusc Dreissena polymorpha. Canadian Journal of Zoologie. 1991;69:405-409.
64. Schloesser DW, Kovalak WP. Infestation of unionids by Dreissena polymorpha in a power plant in Lake Erie. J. Shellfish Research. 1991;10:355-359.
65. Bartáková V, Reichard M. No effect of recent sympatry with invasive zebra mussel on the oviposition decisions and reproductive success of the bitterling fish, a brood parasite of unionid mussels. Hydrobiologica. 2017;794(1):153-166.
66. Bruner KA, Fisher SW, Landrum PF. The role of the zebra mussel, Dreissena polymorpha, In contaminant cycling: II contaminant accumulation. Zebra mussel from algae and suspended particles, and transfer to the benthic invertebrate, gammarus fasciatus. Journal of Great Lakes Research. 1994;735-750.
67. Roper JM, Cherry DS, Simmers JW, Tatem HE. Bioaccumulation of toxicants in the zebra mussel, Dreissena polymorpha, at the Times Beach Confined Disposal Facility, Buffalo, New York. Environmental Pollution. 1996;94:117-129.
68. Rainbow PS, Phillips DJH. Cosmopolitan biomonitors of trace metals. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 1993;26:593–601.
69. Reeders HH, Bij De Vaate A, Slim FJ. The filtration rate of Dreissena polymorpha (Bivalvia) in three Dutch lakes with reference to biological water quality management. Freshwater Biology. 1989; 22:133–141.
70. Fisher SW, Gossiaux DC, Bruner KA, Landrum PF. Investigations of the toxicokinetics of hydrophobic contaminants in the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha), in T. F. Nalepa and D. W. Schloesser (eds.) Zebra mussels: Biology, impacts and controls, Lewis Publ., Ann Arbor, MI. 1993;465–490.
71. Kwan MKH, Chan HM, De Lafontaine I. Metal contamination in zebra mussels (Dreissena Polymorpha) along the St. Lawrence River. Environmental Monitoring Assessment. 2003;88(1-3):193-219.
72. Ion J, de Lafontaine Y, Dumont P. Lapierre L. Contaminant levels in The St. Lawrence River Yellow Perch (Perca flavescens): Spatial variation and implications for monitoring. Canadian Journal of Fisheries Aquatic Science. 1997;54:2930–2946.
73. Gobas FAPC, McCorquodale JR, Haffner GD. Intestinal absorption and bio-magnification of organochlorines. Environmental Toxicology Chemistry. 1993;12:567-576.
74. Kelly BC, Gobas FAPC, McLachlan MS. Intestinal absorption and biomagnification of organic contaminants in fish, wildlife, and humans Environmental Toxicology Chemistry. 2009;23(10):2324-2336.
75. Connelly NA, O’Neill Jr. CR, Knuth BA, Brown TL. Economic impacts of zebra mussels on drinking water treatment and electric power generation facilities. Environmental Management. 2007;40: 105–112.
76. US Department of State Archive. Case Study: Zebra Mussel.
Accessed June 20, 2020
77. Ekis EW Jr, Kern AJ. Zebra Mussel Control Chemical. US 5,209,934. United States Patent and Trademark Office; 1993.
78. Mula RA, Donlan RA. Method for controlling zebra mussels using dodecyl dimethyl ammonium halides. 0457439 B1. European Patent Specification; 1991.
79. Debach, P, Rosen D. Biological. Control by Natural Enemies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK; 1991.
80. Rodgers PB. Potential of biopesticides in agriculture. Pesticide Science. 1993;39: 117-129.
81. Molloy D. Method for Controlling Dreissena Species. US 6,194,194. United States Patent and Trademark Office; 2001.
82. Morgan C. Methods and system for controlling invasive mussel species. Patent Application Publication. US 2020/0068903 A1 United States Patent and Trademark Office; 2020.
83. Lewis DP, Whitby DGE. Method and apparatus for controlling zebra mussels and other bivalves using ultraviolet radiation. US 6,149,343. United States Patent and Trademark Office; 2000.
84. Dölle K. Image: Boat inspection and Cleaning. pdf-file
85. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYDEC). Boating and Paddling.
Accessed June 18, 2020
86. Dölle K. Image: Removed mussels at Disposal Site. pdf-file
87. Stybel N, Fenske C, Schernewski G. Mussel cultivation to improve water quality in the Szczecin lagoon. Journal of Coastal Research. 2009;56:1459–1463.
88. Piesik Z. Biology of Dreissena polymorpha (Pall.) settling on stylon nets and the role of this mollusc in eliminating the seston and the nutrients from the watercourse. Pol. Arch. Hydrobiology. 1983;30:353–361.
89. McLaughlan C, Aldridge DC. Cultivation of zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) within their invaded range to improve water quality in reservoirs, Water Research. 2013;47(13):4357–4369.
90. Sousa R, Novais A, Costa R, Strayer DL. Invasive bivalves in fresh waters: Impacts from individuals to ecosystems and possible control strategies. Hydrobiologia. 2014;735(1):233–251.
91. Bean RA. Process for treatment of wastewater utilizing zebra mussels. US 5,628,904. United States Patent and Trademark Office; 1997.
Accessed July 1, 2020
93. Ral B. Verfahren und Anordnung zur Elimintion von Schwebstoffen und Schwermetallen sowie Bakterien und Viren aus verunreinigtem Wasser. DE 19910278 C2. German Patent Office; 1999.