Reforestation is Not a Mitigation of Climate Change in All Situations – A Literature Review

Main Article Content

Shen Jia Jing


Background: Environmental issues have gained widespread attention from all around the world and most of them originate from the root cause of climate change. Climate change occurs when there is increased concentrations of greenhouse gases in the environment, reflecting less heat back to space. In view of extreme weather and consequences, afforestation is now seen as one of the most effective methods in mitigating the effects of climate change. Increasing popularity of using forests as mitigation methods, however, does not translate to forests being effective solutions in all situations. Being part of our ecosystem, processes of forests are easily altered by climate change itself.

Aims: To ascertain if afforestation can effectively mitigate the effects of climate change in consideration that the processes of trees are affected by climate change itself.

Study Design:  Literature review.

Methods: Data sources include Nature, Science Direct and environmental journals.

Results: Climate change currently increases the ability of forests to mitigate climate change but long-term exposure to increased temperatures and carbon dioxide (CO2) levels reduce their abilities to do so. Location of where afforestation is carried out also affects the extent of effectiveness in reducing CO2 levels and climate change.

Conclusion: Afforestation can mitigate climate change if implemented appropriately, especially where it is effective. However, the primary solution will still be cutting carbon emissions since trees have a biological limit in response to climate change.

Afforestation, terrestrial carbon sink, carbon sequestration, climate change, Global Warming.

Article Details

How to Cite
Jing, S. J. (2019). Reforestation is Not a Mitigation of Climate Change in All Situations – A Literature Review. Asian Journal of Environment & Ecology, 10(2), 1-8.
Review Article


Abbott, et al. Biomass offsets little or none of permafrost carbon release from soils, streams, and wildfire: An expert assessment. Environmental Research Letters. 2016;11(3).

Anonymous. A new tree line; Global warming. The Economist. 2007; 383:852

Bragg Don C. To save the planet, don’t plant trees. Journal of Forestry. 2015; 113(1).

Büntgen, et al. Limited capacity of tree growth to mitigate the global greenhouse effect under predicted warming. Nature Communications. 2019;10(1).

Dawes. Soil warming and carbon dioxide enrichment induce biomass shifts in alpine tree line vegetation. Journal of Global Change Biology. 2015;21(5).

Bala G. Can planting new trees help to reduce global warming? Current Science. 2014;106(12).

Argentina. Plant functional diversity and carbon storage – An empirical test in semi-arid forest ecosystems. Journal of Ecology. 2012;101(1).

Grote,et al. Functional traits of urban trees: Air pollution mitigation potential. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment; 2017.

Hoegh-Guldberg, et al. Impacts of 1.5ºC Global Warming on natural and human systems. In: Global Warming of 1.5°C, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Special Report; 2018.

Julio J, et al. Disparate effects of global-change drivers on mountain conifer forests: warming-induced growth enhancement in young trees vs. carbon dioxide fertilization in old trees from wet sites. Journal of Global Change Biology. 2015;21(3).

Lacis, et al. The role of long-lived greenhouse gases as principal LW control knob that governs the global surface temperature for past and future climate change. Journal of Chemical and Physical Meteorology. 2013;65(1).

Lorenz Lal. Carbon sequestration in forests. Springer Publications; 2010.

Parra, et al. Greenhouse gas emissions in conversion from extensive pasture to other agricultural systems in the Andean region of Colombia. Journal of Environment, Development and Sustainability. 2019;21(1).

Popkin. How much can forests fight climate change?’ Nature. 2019;565 (7739).

Song Zhaoliang, Parr Jeffrey F, Guo Fengshan. Potential of Global cropland phytolith carbon sink from optimization of cropping system and fertilization. PlosOne. 2013;8(9).

Ussiri David. The role of forest and soil carbon sequestrations on climate change mitigation; 2017.

Wang, et al. Global warming caused by afforestation in the Southern Hemisphere. Ecological Indicators. 2015;52.

Wang, et al. Emerging negative impact of warming on summer carbon uptake in northern ecosystems. Nature Communications. 2018;9(1).

Yannawut, et al. Community forest for Global Warming mitigation: The technique for estimation of biomass and above ground carbon storage using remote sensing method. The Journal "Agriculture and Forestry. 2018;64(3).

Bonan, et al. Effects of boreal forest vegetation on global climate. Nature. 1992;359:716–718.

Field, et al. Feedbacks of terrestrial ecosystems to climate change. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2007;32:1–29.

Chapin III FS, Randerson JT, McGuire AD, Foley JA, Field CB. Changing feedbacks in the climate–biosphere system. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2008;6:313–320.

Anderson, et al. Biophysical considerations in forestry for climate protection. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2011;9:174–182.

Betts, et al. Offset of the potential carbon sink from boreal forestation by decreases in surface albedo. Nature. 2000;408:187–200.

Bathiany, et al. Combined biogeophysical and biogeochemical effects of large-scale forest cover changes in the MPI earth system model. Biogeosciences. 2010;7:1383–1399.

Pongratz, et al. Past land use decisions have increased mitigation potential of reforestation. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2011;38:L15701.

Pan, et al. A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests. Science. 2011;333:988–993.

MacDougall, et al. Significant contribution to climate warming from the permafrost carbon feedback. Nat. Geosci. 2012;5:719–21.

Schuur EAG, et al. Expert assessment of vulnerability of permafrost carbon to climate change. Climate Change. 2013;119:359–74.

Qian, et al. Enhanced terrestrial carbon uptake in the Northern High Latitudes in the 21st century. Coupled Carbon Cycle Climate Model Intercomparison; 2010.

Koven, et al. Permafrost carbon − Climate feedback is sensitive to deep soil carbon decomposability but not deep soil nitrogen dynamics Proc.Natl Acad. Sci. 2015a;112: 3752–7.

Koven, et al. A simplified, data- constrained approach to estimate the permafrost carbon – Climate feedback. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. 2015b;A373: 20140423.

Koven, et al. Permafrost carbon – Climate feedbacks accelerate global warming Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108: 14769–74.

Schaefer, et al. The impact of the permafrost carbon feedback on global climate. Environ. Res. Lett. 2014;9: 085003.