Household Indigenous Drought Coping and Adaptation Strategies in Baringo County, Kenya

Main Article Content

Maurice Manyonge Pepela
Ferdinand Nabiswa
Edward Mugalavai

Abstract

Coping and adaptation to the impacts of climate change such as drought is increasingly necessary. Due to the expanding global impacts of climate change coping and adaptation agenda among various agencies, it is of primary importance to understand the coping and adaptation strategies in order to generate the most appropriate and effective interventions. The study established drought coping and adaptation strategies employed by households in Baringo County and this was based on Pressure and Release (PAR) model which grounds the framework for understanding vulnerability to disasters and adaptation. The 224 household heads were selected by simple random sampling out of which 204 completed the questionnaire. The study adopted description research design. Data was analyzed by both descriptive and qualitative statistics where the SPSS package version 22 was used in the analysis where the chi – square and percentages were obtained. The study established that households had various drought coping and adaptation strategies where 77 (37.7%) informed the study that during drought season they normally shift to other ways or sources of livelihoods, herd splitting were 58 (28.4%) while 44 (21.6%) do herd and crop diversification. A calculated chi – square (χ2 =79.186, p–value=0.000 df=4) of the main coping mechanisms indicated that the variation was statistically significant. The study provided baseline information for further research. However, there is need for outside intervention or strategies for effectiveness since the community does not have well laid down strategies for climate change coping and adaptation.

Keywords:
Climate change, coping, adaptation, households, drought.

Article Details

How to Cite
Manyonge Pepela, M., Nabiswa, F., & Mugalavai, E. (2019). Household Indigenous Drought Coping and Adaptation Strategies in Baringo County, Kenya. Asian Journal of Environment & Ecology, 10(4), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajee/2019/v10i430121
Section
Original Research Article

References

Burton I, Diringer E, Smith J. Adaptation to climate change: International policy options. Pew Center on Global Climate Change Arlington, VA; 2006.

Dow K, Berkhout F, Preston BL. Limits to adaptation to climate change: A risk approach. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 2013;5:384-391.

O'Brien KL. Do values subjectively define the limits to climate change adaptation? Adapting to climate change: Thresholds, values, governance. 2009:164,

Bradshaw B, Dolan H, Smit B. Farm-level adaptation to climatic variability and change: Crop diversification in the Canadian prairies. Climatic Change. 2004;67:119–141.

FAO. Adaptation to climate change in agriculture, forestry and fisheries: Perspectives, Framework and Priorities, Rome: FAO; 2007.

Soussain J, Burton I, Hammil A. Livelihoods and climate change: Combining disaster risk reduction, natural resource management and climate change adaptation in a new approach to the reduction of vulnerability and poverty. Winnipeg: International Institute of Sustainable Development; 2003.

Reynolds JF, Smith DMS, Lambin EF, Turner BL, Mortimore M, Batterbury SP, Downing TE, Dowlatabadi H, Fernández RJ, Herrick JE, Huber-Sannwald E. Global desertification: Building a science for dryland development. Science. 2007;316:847-851.

Maru YT, Smith MS, Sparrow A, Pinho PF and Dube OP. A linked vulnerability and resilience framework for adaptation pathways in remote disadvantaged communities. Global Environmental Change. 2014;28:337-350.

WFP. Baringo County Capacity Gaps and needs assessment. Nairobi. World Food Programme; 2015.

Baringo County Annual Development Plan 2017 – 2018 (2016). County Treasury and Economic Planning; 2016.

Kothari CR. Research methodology: Methods and techniques. Delhi: Dahmesh Printers; 2004.

Nassiuma DK. Survey and sampling method. University of Nairobi Press: Nairobi; 2000.

Omolo NA. Gender and climate change induced conflict in pastoral communities: Case study of Turkana in Northwestern Kenya. In: African Journal of Conflict Resolution. 2010’102:81-102.

Morton J, Meadows N. Pastoralism and sustainable rural livelihoods, NRI Policy Series 11. Chatham, UK: Natural Resources Institute; 2000.

Morton J. Pastoralism, drought and planning: Lessons from Northern Kenya and elsewhere, Chatham, UK: Natural Resources Institute; 2001.

Turpie J, Midgley G, Brown C, Barnes JI, Pallett J, Desmet P, Tarr J, Tarr P. Climate change vulnerability and adaptation assessment for Namibia's biodiversity and protected area system. Ministry of Environment and Tourism, Directorate of Parks & Wildlife Management, Windhoek. 2010:248.

David A, Braby J, Zeidler J, Kandjinga L, Ndokosho J. Building adaptive capacity in rural Namibia: Community information toolkits on climate change. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management. 2013;5:215–229.

Rass N. Policies and strategies to address vulnerability of pastoralists in Sub-Saharan Africa, PPLPI Working Paper No. 37, FAO, Rome, Italy; 2006.

Orindi V, Nyong’ A, Herrero M. Pastoral livelihood adaptation to drought and institutional interventions in Kenya. Human Development Report Office Occasional Paper 2007/2008. Nairobi: UNDP; 2008.

Gibbons S. Draft discussion brief: Towards peace and security in dry land Kenya: The demand for a new approach. Pastoralist Parliamentary Group and Drylands Learning and Capacity Building Initiative for Improved Policy and Practice in the Horn of Africa; 2014.